Getting Beyond “Abortion Neutrality”
If Hyde is unfair and discriminatory, why is extending it “neutral”?
Read MoreIf Hyde is unfair and discriminatory, why is extending it “neutral”?
Read MoreConservative Episcopalians have denounced the election of only the second openly gay bishop, and the Archbishop of Canterbury has urged bishops to not seat her. But others, like one of the first women priests, aren’t worried about the well loved bishop-elect who remains focused on her duties.
Read MoreRichard Cohen, leader of a program that advocates the “changing” of homosexuals to straight, disavows anti-gay legislation in Uganda, but doesn’t see the connection between it and his own missionary efforts in that country.
Read MoreFollowing lead of others, Warren finally issues a statement.
Read MoreThe principle of the Hyde Amendment, which restricted federal funds from paying for abortion, is now seen as an acceptable, “abortion-neutral” position for the pro-choice party. How did the most significant anti-abortion legislation in history become a moderate compromise?
Read MoreAmerican Christians speak out as others remains silent.
Read MoreBen Nelson says he won’t vote to end debate on a Senate health care bill without his Stupak anti-abortion amendment.
Read MoreChristian conservatives won’t hear of it.
Read MoreLGBT people in Uganda will soon face death and even jail for simply existing.
Read MoreAt Capitol Hill rally, pro-choice Democrats talk women’s rights, not common ground.
Read More